I was reminded of the idiom that says you never know what you have until its gone is one the other day, walking on the Copacabana promenade early one morning with the sun fighting the wispy clouds in trying to come out. I was grateful that the famous black and white stones on the walkway had been worn smooth by millions of Havaianas walking up and down as they didn’t hurt my bare feet as much. My shoes had been soaked early when I got caught by a wave I didn’t see coming and I decided to walk back to the hotel some 4km away with them in my hand. I hadn’t walked anywhere barefoot in ages. But we used to do it all the time in Durban. And the main strip in Rio, Copacabana Beach reminded me a lot of the golden mile in Durban. Only Copacabana is scaled up a little bit and possibly a little more famous. Durban is however not a 10 and 1/2 flight away.
In Indian society, every older unrelated male is an uncle and older unrelated female an aunty (not aunt, aunty). Your real uncle and aunts are given their designations by the relationship they come to be your real aunts and uncles by. Your mother’s brothers are your Mamas and your father’s sisters your Poowas. Or Foi or Aatha depending on the dialect you speak. And you then also have big dads and big moms for the eldest uncles and aunts. Everyone else who is older is designated uncle or aunt and then their name. The neighbour, Aunty Saras (not to be confused with the neighbour-aunty, Saras) or Uncle Sagren who lives down the road. When, as an Indian kid, you don’t know someone by their name you default to some attribute of how they look or what they do with and added uncle or aunty at the front. So the Fowl Aunty was the lady who provided fresh chickens on a Saturday morning, Fisher Uncle or Uncle Fishy was a good fisherman and the Milk Uncle drove the van that sold bread and milk and sweets that came around at 3 o’ clock every afternoon. That’s probably how my mother ended up being the Basket Aunty and then the Sweet Aunty. Continue reading “My mom, the Basket Aunty…”
This is a story about how I got into a fight the other day. Not a real fight in a grungy bar or someplace like that. Or anything that involved fisticuffs or any real physical violence. An online fight on Instagram. Well maybe an exchange of words really, not to say that things don’t get out of hand on social media pages sometimes. I was scrolling through my Instagram feed and saw a post with a Sony camera body and I think 3 different Canon lens mounted. And one of the first comments on the post was to the effect of why, if Sony cameras are so good, do 90% of the posts show them with Canon lenses.
Now the question could obviously be interpreted as a genuine query on why this general observation would be so. Or, and this was the more likely intention, it was a backhanded swipe at Sony using one of the common reasons people use not to buy the camera bodies – Canon and Nikon glass is considerably better. If you haven’t noticed this already, camera nerds can be very very brand loyal. To the point that they will pick fights with users of other brands in what can only be described as almost religious zeal. One of the first questions a camera nerd will ask is what brand are you shooting on. Then they will tell you about what brand they are on and how it is better than your own. Even I was guilty of that and some would argue this post talks to the same.
To an extent, with my limited use of my Sony camera and lens and the limited time Sony has been in country, I will concede that Canon and Nikon have the best range of lenses but Sony is indeed catching up. Sony mirrorless mount lenses were limited in the past but the range is constantly being added to. However, I have to admit that the good to great lenses come at quite astounding prices. Sony recently announced a $12000 400mmF2.8 lens for wildlife photographers which is going to break the bank of many Sony users as soon as it lands. If you look at the ratings on DXO mark for some of the GMaster lenses you will see that they actually are much better than their Canon and Nikon counterparts on the high megapixel count camera bodies. My Sony 100-400mm Gmaster ranks a few points higher than the Canon 100-400mm MkII lens and almost as high as the 200-400mm Canon lens. But the cost of the Sony is about 30% more than the Canon and what I have also been finding of late is that the availability is also an issue here on the Southern tip of Africa.
So for the compromise of the loss of a little (sometimes hardly noticeable) quality and saving a lot of money, a lot of Canon lenses get used in combination with the Sony bodies. It just makes sense to use the best body you can get your hands on with the best lens you can get your hands on. And Canon lenses in particular work really well with the Metabones adapters, losing very little autofocus speed and the quality of the lenses are for the most part close to what you would get with the native Sony lenses for stills (with the caveat that it may not be as great when shooting video). Nikon lenses on the other hand don’t, or rather don’t have an adapter currently that performs the same as the Metabones does. So this is part of the reason that there are so many Canon lenses being used on the Sony bodies, and maybe not so many Nikon lenses.
The other part I have mentioned before. For the R32 000 I paid for my Sony Alpha A7III, I would not be able to even get a Canon camera body that currently comes even halfway close. The 6D MKII is full frame but slower on the frame rate and low light performance is worse than the 6D MKI so worse than the Sony and almost no comparison on the autofocus. The 5DMKIV has a higher megapixel count but is closer to R60 000 all in and also is slower on the frame and autofocus is also perhaps not as well suited for action and fast moving objects. So a lot of other Canon users are moving across to Sony and have a lot of glass that they bring with them. Why not the same with Nikon? Because Nikon has for a large part, kept up with the Sony bodies’ performance in the last few years and actually are better camera body makers than Sony so the need to change is not as great. And without the added bonuses of being able to migrate expensive lenses across, I think fewer Nikon users may be tempted by the Sony camera bodies. There are actually a number of stories of Canon users who got tired of waiting and switched to Nikon as well.
You are probably thinking that’s all well and good but Canon will probably catch up with their own Mirrorless Full Frame camera body soon. And indeed, that’s exactly what some of the rumours are saying. Canon and Nikon have both recently announced their intentions to build a new mirrorless full frame camera aimed at directly competing with Sony. And I believe that they may well do it, except they are about 5 years behind already so it has to be a massive leap forward in terms of technology but would also require a massive mind shift on the part of the predominantly DSLR manufacturers. And that is they will have to aim to cannabalise some of their own DSLR sales to slot the mirrorless full frames into the current line up. Canon has been particularly bad at this though, deliberately down speccing cameras so that they do not compete with each other in recent years (perhaps the reason why the 6D MKII was a bit of a damp squib). So I believe they know what needs to be done but whether they will do it is still debatable.
I think, for what its worth, Canon should perhaps try an alternate tack. They know how to make lenses and how to make a lot of different lenses. If I were Canon I would approach the guys at Sony and offer to make their lenses for them, with the correct mount to fit the Sony systems. Like Tamron and Sigma currently do with their lenses. Keep making the DSLRs because there are pros who will never switch off Canon so the market may be shrinking but could be there for a while. And avoid the distraction of trying to out-compete Sony on the full frame mirrorless front and perhaps carve a new niche as lens suppliers. But then again time could well prove me wrong and they could make a good show of it. Maybe by this time next year we will know, I just got a case of the proverbial ants in the pants and could not wait that long to see if they came close. And as much as I love my Canon lenses, if I can shoot with them on the Sony body then why not? So do I shoot Canon or Sony? Both actually. And DJI to boot.
So. Have you read enough about the Sony Alpha cameras already? Actually if you are not a camera geek like me you probably haven’t heard much of the Sony camera’s currently taking the world by storm. Unless you are friends with me on any form of social media – then you probably heard too much in the last couple weeks and you are probably hoping that I would stop. And I promise that this blog post is the culmination of what has been an exciting few weeks. I therefore ask that you bear with me and maybe this is the last you’ll hear of it…for now!
Ask me when did I get into wildlife photography and I would struggle to answer. Before getting my first DSLR I had been to the Kruger a total of 1 times in my life, late in 2005 I think it was. My progression was first into landscape photography, documenting the places I had been travelling to and I started of shooting wide. The transition to long lenses I think only started late in 2011 when I got a 70-300mm USM and even then the next step up did not come for a long while. So I will run you through some of the lenses I have owned and used and still use in some instances and hopefully guide your own journey. Continue reading “Which lens to choose for beginner wildlife and nature?”
So if you read my blog a few months back on the trials and tribulations of setting up the DJI Spark you will know how excited I was for my first foray into droning and drone photography (Spark of insanity ) But almost as much as it excited me the littlest drone in the DJI line up did leave me frustrated for the 4 months or so I did own it. Flying through a WIFI connection to the phone, the biggest bug bear I had was that the furthest out I could get it before losing signal was just over 100m at the limited height of 120m. Limited battery life was addressed through multiple batteries and the ease of flying with the remote was actually quite impressive. And then, in almost an ultimate act of insanity and almost to fulfill the prophecy I laid out in September, on the 30 December, the little spark flew out about 70m over the waves of Nature’s Valley and about 4m high then started to come back in reverse and decided to spit its own battery out and plummet into the knee-deep water of the Southern Indian Ocean.
Its my birthday next week you know…
Yeah of course I know
It would please me much if you were there…
Yeah I know that as well
So will you come?
But what do I come as?
It’s not a costume party, you don’t have to dress up but…
Shut up you know what I mean
…you can come as Hermoine dressed in her Gryffindor uniform perhaps?
Be serious! You know what I mean!
No I don’t actually…
Who do I come as? In relation to you?
Do I have to spell it out then?
Come as part of the friendship that they can’t comprehend, a bond that only you and I understand,
As my biggest critic who keeps me honest,
The person I can achieve anything with when you are standing beside me,
The one I wish was on every one of my adventures.
Come as the girl who smiles through the pain,
Who my heart breaks for only to be rebuilt by your strength and courage,
Come as the reader, the writer, the swimmer, the hiker,
The sister, the daughter, the scrappy street fighter.
Come as the person I would miss the most if you didn’t,
The part of me that would be missing if you were not there.
But mostly come as all that makes you YOU,
The person I perhaps hardly even know but who I want to spend every minute learning…
One of my quotes of all time is from Albert Einstein that goes “I have no particular talent, I am merely extremely inquisitive”. Now I make no claim to be anywhere close to the genius that was Einstein but I would say that I too have no particular talent except perhaps for being curious. And that can get you a long way sometimes but perhaps curiosity is not all you need (cos we all know that love is all you need). I’ve, in the last couple months, been having a recurring conversation with a few different people on the topic of natural talent versus hard work towards a goal versus having the better tools on hand to finish the job and buying some luck with that. The conversations seem pretty pointless because they inevitably lead nowhere because this debate is as old as time. I mean I’m sure even the early cavemen had hunters who made more kills because of a better spear or fishermen who caught fish easier because they were fishing 7 days a week. But let me give you my take because you’ve already read so far in, you might as well read on…
So full 2 weeks of the New Year have come and gone. If you are still holding on to your resolutions good on you! If have already you broke them for whatever reason, well you only 2 weeks in so you can always wake up, shout “Mulligan!” and start over. If you didn’t make any, you do you as best as you can, because you never know who’s watching and looking up to you! My resolution for 2018 is actually something along those lines, but before we get there some background.